Waves of Money

The Echelon Insights Team • Feb 17, 2021

Everyone continues to discuss what the new normal is going to look like as the pandemic restrictions are gradually lifted (fingers crossed). Well, there is nothing normal about the markets at the moment. Despite being less than a year out of a supposed bear market, index levels are at all-time highs along with valuations at decade-long highs, while the economy continues to gradually recover and unemployment remains elevated. Speculative behaviour is rampant whether you look at IPOs/SPACs, niche industries, crypto, thematic ETFs, the list goes on. Adding to this are the new platforms, like Reddit, which crowd into one investment then move onto another. 


Money that flows into or out of an asset class, sector or individual company matters, sometimes a lot. Consider the fact that apart from initial or secondary public offerings or option-related issuance from a government treasury, the number of shares available for purchase in a given company is relatively stable. We are simplifying things here, but if a group of new investors, perhaps Reddit followers who just received a fresh cheque (or check) from their new President, decide to put some money into “ABC Co.”, all else being equal, the share price will rise. It will rise until enough pre-existing or new investors decide that they are willing to sell their shares given the new price. Of course, this works in both directions. 

Chart 1 depicts a number of companies, and one commodity, that witnessed a social media-induced rush of investors. Note the various changes in price and duration before falling back to previous levels. Those companies that had pre-existing sizeable short positions, a narrower investor base – essentially the smaller companies – experienced a bigger impact from this thrust of new investors. In some cases, this impact lasted for days or over a week+. Contrast this with Nokia, a widely held global telecom company that saw its share price jump for one day; or silver, a much bigger market than all the companies in the chart combined, which barely budged. All of these provide mini examples demonstrating the importance of money flow given an investments liquidity or size. 


Looking at the bigger picture, we can see fund flows in other ways. ETF issuance provides a glimpse into the changing flow in and out of ETFs. Keep in mind there is a multi-decades migration afoot from traditional fund structures to ETFs, but you can see acceleration and deceleration of flows. Over the past few months and accelerating into 2021, we are witnessing faster inflow into equity ETFs (green bars). This inflow is in part helping the market handle bad news and not react negatively. Soft economic data, riots in early January, COVID cases, all seem to have no impact on equities. Of course, there is good news out there too, but these flows help on the margin. 

Naturally, a few billion of inflows or outflows won’t move the overall market very much just based on its size; think of the Reddit crowd and the silver market. However, one interesting development over the past year is the rise of thematic ETFs. These are the baskets of securities attempting to capture the attention of a certain theme: electric cars, cyber security, 5G, the cloud, e-gaming—take your pick. 



This is where things get interesting. Remember flows are most impactful when the market is smaller or less liquid. These thematic ETFs, which are often based on just a handful of companies and in some cases the liquidity of those companies are on the lighter side, have been receiving massive inflows. So far in 2021, U.S. equity- listed ETFs have seen $85 billion in inflows. Within this number, $21 billion has been channelled into thematic ETFs. Keep in mind that U.S. equity ETF total assets sit at about $4.6 trillion while the thematic ETF total assets sit at $110 billion. 


We are fans of ETFs, and manage three of them. However, we are aware that passive ETFs piggyback on the work of active management. If the price of an asset is too high, active managers will sell; or they will buy if sufficiently low—this results in a more efficiently priced asset. Passive ETFs can then offer the index or a basket, comprised of supposedly efficiently priced assets thanks to active managers, at a cheaper price point (lower fee). But the migration to more ETFs has resulted in less active management in the market and likely less efficient pricing. 

When you factor in this secular change to the market participant mix, combined with the sizeable inflows into thematic ETFs – which are comprised of many companies that are not very liquid or widely held – it’s likely that there is lots of mispricing going on. We are not saying you shouldn’t love the prospect of sitting in the back of your electric car using your 5G phone to participate in an online Madden football tournament hosted on the cloud. We are saying these flows are likely leading to some asset mispricing. 


Investment Implications 

Thematic investing is not going away, it is an efficient way to gain access to a key theme and can add a bit of flare to a portfolio. Just be aware that in these pockets there is an elevated chance of assets being mispriced due to the recent inflows. 

Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. unless otherwise noted.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Richardson Wealth Limited and are used herein under a non-exclusive license by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) for information purposes only. The statements and statistics contained herein are based on material believed to be reliable but there is no guarantee they are accurate or complete. Particular investments or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual's objectives in consultation with their Echelon representative. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”), its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of its author, Richardson Wealth Limited (“Richardson”), used under a non-exclusive license and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) or its affiliates.


This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete.


Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Echelon and Richardson do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. 

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

By The Echelon Insights Team 18 Oct, 2021
Inflation sucks. It is essentially a tax on those consuming goods or services, as things simply cost more. Even worse, it is a regressive tax given lower income/wealth consumers tend to spend a higher portion of their income. Now, if you are sitting comfortably on your nest egg and not spending too much, should inflation worry you? That depends on this raging debate as to whether the current spike in inflation is a blip caused by temporary demand and supply imbalances…or the start of something longer term. If inflation runs hotter for longer, the value of that nest egg erodes in real terms—clearly a risk to any long-term financial plan. Currently the good news is higher prices have been predominantly found in what the Atlanta Fed calls ‘flexible priced categories.’ Breaking down the categories in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) into those that are flexible and those that are sticky clearly demonstrates that the headline number is being almost completely pushed higher by the flexible categories. The good news is the prices in these categories can come back down just as fast, supporting the “inflation is transitory” argument. In fact, many have started this descent.  A confluence of factors caused the CPI spike. The pandemic disrupted logistic supply chains that have been increasingly run tighter over the years to reduce costs. Demand came back faster than expected and focused more on durable goods. Global spending behaviours changed quickly. Meanwhile supply adjustments are not as quick. Based on manufacturing survey data, it appears that the worse may be behind us. Readings are still high in many PMI survey questions, including slower delivery times, customer inventories too low, and backlogs rising, but they appear to have peaked a few months ago and are moving in the right direction.
By The Echelon Insights Team 12 Oct, 2021
The market advance over the past year has truly turned a lot of heads, in a good way. After the initial bear and bounce triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic, markets went on a phenomenal run. The rollout of vaccines driving the re-opening trend in the economy helped, as did the continued emergency monetary and fiscal support policies. And what a run. During this advance, consumer spending pivoted much more to durables such as vehicles, homes, and technology. While nominal GDP doesn’t care as much where an individual decides to spend their money, the equity markets much prefer you buy some durables instead of services (like a dinner). 
By The Echelon Insights Team 04 Oct, 2021
Challenges ahead — Greg Taylor September has once again lived up to its reputation for volatility. In many ways this had to be expected as equity markets have experienced one of the longest runs of stable returns and minimal drawdowns in history. However, the timing of this recent volatility should not surprise many, as most of the positive tailwinds that have carried the market to these levels are starting to fade away, setting up what could be a difficult period for capital markets. Global central banks are the biggest and most important factor that have helped elevate recent returns. To their credit, they learned from the mistakes of the global financial crisis where indecision and delay exacerbated things—this time, right from the beginning, the banks did everything they could to help the markets and the economy. But all good things must come to an end, and 18 months after the start of the pandemic, it is time for central banks to begin to remove some emergency measures. This isn’t a bad thing at all. Central banks need to begin to normalize policy to prepare for the next crisis. But it is a change from the recent normal and means that central banks may be less accommodating for the next while. This action resulted in bond yields moving higher across the curve and has led to a change in sector leadership. The growth/value trade has been a subject of much debate over the last few years. As growth has dominated in a period of ever lower bond yields, with the threat of inflation, has this turned? Will the rally in energy be the trigger to get this going once again? The energy sector was a victim of the climate movement, but the resulting cuts to production may be setting us up for a bull market in the commodities as we are already seeing shortages in both natural gas and heating oil. The resulting price increases is also adding further ammunition to the inflation argument as higher costs will undoubtably flow through to the price of goods. What no one really expected in the month was the China risk. Consistently over the last year, China has been working to extend their influence over the capital markets, which has caused many to question if China is at all investible? Their constant clamp down on social media and other growth sectors became a secondary concern as their largest construction company ran into liquidity issues. Evergrande was never going to be a Lehman moment, but it had the potential to leave some scars. For the moment, this risk has faded to the background, but it can’t be ignored and has the potential to flare up once again. What could prove to be the biggest risk to the markets in the near term is earnings season. With the advent of quant funds gaining a greater market share, we have seen companies that beat earning expectations gain versus those that don’t. But as easy comparable estimates fade, huge beats will be harder to achieve. We have already seen some notable companies miss these expectations and the risk is that the next month will be filled with negative earnings revisions. One of the biggest reasons for earning misses has been from broken supply chains. Covid lockdowns and pulled-forward demand for goods did immeasurable damage to the concept of ‘just-in-time’ inventory models. Companies continue to scramble for components, such as semiconductors, in order to product goods. As indicated by the surge in used car prices, the automotive sector has been one of the hardest hit. Until this is fixed, we must expect inflated prices of goods and services and squeezing margins. Whether this is temporary or permanent is still up for debate, but its another headwind to markets.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: