Rarefied Air

The Echelon Insights Team • Oct 12, 2021

The market advance over the past year has truly turned a lot of heads, in a good way. After the initial bear and bounce triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic, markets went on a phenomenal run. The rollout of vaccines driving the re-opening trend in the economy helped, as did the continued emergency monetary and fiscal support policies. And what a run. During this advance, consumer spending pivoted much more to durables such as vehicles, homes, and technology. While nominal GDP doesn’t care as much where an individual decides to spend their money, the equity markets much prefer you buy some durables instead of services (like a dinner). 

All this good market news has lifted the global market capitalization of equities to about $120 trillion—a full $30 trillion higher than before the 

pandemic hit. This is incredible as it sure doesn’t feel like the world is 33% better off than before the pandemic. In fact, it took a decade to add $30 

trillion to the global market cap from the peak before the global financial crisis. The latest $30 trillion took a year and a half. 


It is not just the spending habits that changed. Given the market performance and high savings rates (since many are not spending as much on services), 

markets have enjoyed solid inflows over the past year. That super-charged savings rate isn’t just being tucked away in bank accounts. 


With temporarily changed behaviours combined with monetary/fiscal policy, this may have dragged forward future performance. Or, in other words, some 

of these abnormally high returns may mean revert, leading to more muted returns ahead. To demonstrate how far outside the norm some markets have moved, lets take a look from a few different perspectives. 


There is no denying the economy and the market, while related, can behave very differently at times. Equities can go up or down while the economy remains stable. Sometimes, the economy accelerates and the market retreats. Variances in the direction of the markets and the economy led to the often-used phrase, “the market is not the economy.”. And while that may seem like the case at times, there is a strong tether between the two. 

The economy drives corporate earnings and if there were a constant valuation multiple placed on earnings, the relationship between the economy and the market would be clearer. But once investor sentiment gets in there, sometimes paying more for a dollar of earnings, sometimes less, the waters are muddied. 



Based on the global GDP measure vs the global equity market valuation, we appear to be in some uncharted territory. Just looking at the chart, you can see this is far from a perfect relationship, but you may also see that when GDP is rising nicely so is the market. And when GDP growth slows or falls, as does the equity market…roughly speaking. Nonetheless, the advance in the equity market of late does not seem anywhere near commensurate to the advance in the economy. Also worth noting is that the global GDP metric is annual and the move up from 2020 to 2021 is forecast to slow from 2021 to 2022.

There is a connection between the economy and the market but comparing them is comparing apples to oranges. The measure for the economy as we know is GDP: an annual number that attempts to capture all economic activity. In other words, if all economic activity stopped for a year, GDP would be zero. Meanwhile, a company’s value is most often based on its earnings capabilities: both today and into the future. Clearly a temporal mismatch. 


So let us simplify it even further. For the S&P 500, ignore the size relative to the economy, ignore the price-to-earnings, sales, book, EBITDA, DCF, etc. Instead, just look at the long-term return relative to the return of late. This chart is the S&P 500 since the 1950s with a least squares trendline. The trendline works out to an annualized 6.7%, excluding dividends. Add a point or two from dividends, a respectable return. But clearly over the past couple years the S&P 500 briefly dipped below trend during the pandemic induced bear market then rocketed well above. Not as far above as the 1990s tech bubble but getting closer.

Turning to Canada’s TSX, things certainly look more interesting and to be less of a concern. Note the long-term trend line has a compound growth rate of 5.8% during this period, but the TSX has historically enjoyed a higher dividend yield. Hence, the performance spread of the S&P outperforming the TSX is lower than this would imply. More importantly while the U.S. equity market is well above its trend, the TSX is still below its trend. 

It’s a narrowly advancing stock market compared with earlier this year. The NYSE advance/decline line has yet to catch up to the peak in early June. Similarly, the percentage of stocks trading above their 200-day moving average has fallen steadily over the past four months to a current reading of just over 50%.

Investment implications 

“This time is different,” is often labeled the most expensive words for an investor’s portfolio. This investor lesson is based on mean reversion. When things go on for too long or get too excessive, they often revert back to the mean or often below it for a time. The world may be different. The ongoing policy experiment with Modern Monetary Theory could be changing the rules. Perhaps TINA (i.e., “there is no alternative”) is the reason markets will keep rising. Maybe Elon Musk’s giving his new puppy the name Floki is worth a few billion in the crypto market in its namesake. Maybe I should launch the Baxter coin. And maybe these markets keep going for months or quarters or a year+. History says otherwise and there is a mean reversion out there that will likely be bigger the more this market goes from here. The timing of it remains anyone’s guess, but keeping a defensive tilt remains out mindset. 

Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. unless otherwise noted.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Richardson Wealth Limited and are used herein under a non-exclusive license by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) for information purposes only. The statements and statistics contained herein are based on material believed to be reliable but there is no guarantee they are accurate or complete. Particular investments or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual's objectives in consultation with their Echelon representative. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”), its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of its author, Richardson Wealth Limited (“Richardson”), used under a non-exclusive license and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) or its affiliates.


This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete.


Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Echelon and Richardson do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. 

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

By The Echelon Insights Team 18 Oct, 2021
Inflation sucks. It is essentially a tax on those consuming goods or services, as things simply cost more. Even worse, it is a regressive tax given lower income/wealth consumers tend to spend a higher portion of their income. Now, if you are sitting comfortably on your nest egg and not spending too much, should inflation worry you? That depends on this raging debate as to whether the current spike in inflation is a blip caused by temporary demand and supply imbalances…or the start of something longer term. If inflation runs hotter for longer, the value of that nest egg erodes in real terms—clearly a risk to any long-term financial plan. Currently the good news is higher prices have been predominantly found in what the Atlanta Fed calls ‘flexible priced categories.’ Breaking down the categories in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) into those that are flexible and those that are sticky clearly demonstrates that the headline number is being almost completely pushed higher by the flexible categories. The good news is the prices in these categories can come back down just as fast, supporting the “inflation is transitory” argument. In fact, many have started this descent.  A confluence of factors caused the CPI spike. The pandemic disrupted logistic supply chains that have been increasingly run tighter over the years to reduce costs. Demand came back faster than expected and focused more on durable goods. Global spending behaviours changed quickly. Meanwhile supply adjustments are not as quick. Based on manufacturing survey data, it appears that the worse may be behind us. Readings are still high in many PMI survey questions, including slower delivery times, customer inventories too low, and backlogs rising, but they appear to have peaked a few months ago and are moving in the right direction.
By The Echelon Insights Team 04 Oct, 2021
Challenges ahead — Greg Taylor September has once again lived up to its reputation for volatility. In many ways this had to be expected as equity markets have experienced one of the longest runs of stable returns and minimal drawdowns in history. However, the timing of this recent volatility should not surprise many, as most of the positive tailwinds that have carried the market to these levels are starting to fade away, setting up what could be a difficult period for capital markets. Global central banks are the biggest and most important factor that have helped elevate recent returns. To their credit, they learned from the mistakes of the global financial crisis where indecision and delay exacerbated things—this time, right from the beginning, the banks did everything they could to help the markets and the economy. But all good things must come to an end, and 18 months after the start of the pandemic, it is time for central banks to begin to remove some emergency measures. This isn’t a bad thing at all. Central banks need to begin to normalize policy to prepare for the next crisis. But it is a change from the recent normal and means that central banks may be less accommodating for the next while. This action resulted in bond yields moving higher across the curve and has led to a change in sector leadership. The growth/value trade has been a subject of much debate over the last few years. As growth has dominated in a period of ever lower bond yields, with the threat of inflation, has this turned? Will the rally in energy be the trigger to get this going once again? The energy sector was a victim of the climate movement, but the resulting cuts to production may be setting us up for a bull market in the commodities as we are already seeing shortages in both natural gas and heating oil. The resulting price increases is also adding further ammunition to the inflation argument as higher costs will undoubtably flow through to the price of goods. What no one really expected in the month was the China risk. Consistently over the last year, China has been working to extend their influence over the capital markets, which has caused many to question if China is at all investible? Their constant clamp down on social media and other growth sectors became a secondary concern as their largest construction company ran into liquidity issues. Evergrande was never going to be a Lehman moment, but it had the potential to leave some scars. For the moment, this risk has faded to the background, but it can’t be ignored and has the potential to flare up once again. What could prove to be the biggest risk to the markets in the near term is earnings season. With the advent of quant funds gaining a greater market share, we have seen companies that beat earning expectations gain versus those that don’t. But as easy comparable estimates fade, huge beats will be harder to achieve. We have already seen some notable companies miss these expectations and the risk is that the next month will be filled with negative earnings revisions. One of the biggest reasons for earning misses has been from broken supply chains. Covid lockdowns and pulled-forward demand for goods did immeasurable damage to the concept of ‘just-in-time’ inventory models. Companies continue to scramble for components, such as semiconductors, in order to product goods. As indicated by the surge in used car prices, the automotive sector has been one of the hardest hit. Until this is fixed, we must expect inflated prices of goods and services and squeezing margins. Whether this is temporary or permanent is still up for debate, but its another headwind to markets.
By The Echelon Insights Team 27 Sep, 2021
The life blood of the equity market is the earnings generated by the companies in the index. Sometimes the market pays more for these earnings, like these days, sometimes less. For instance over the past decade, the Price-to-earnings (PE or market multiple) for the S&P 500 has ranged from 10.3 to 23.2 with the current level at 21.1. This is based on forward 12-month consensus estimates for earnings. Canada’s TSX has a similar range, 10.8 to 20.8, although its current PE ratio at 16x is not in the upper range. Attempting to understand how much the market will pay or value $1 of earnings clearly changes and sometimes it changes fast. The market multiple is influenced by many factors. Yields in the bond market have an influence given this is a competing asset class to equities. Historically, higher yields have coincided with a lower PE ratio for the equity market. I mean if you are going to receive say a guaranteed 5% coupon from bonds, you won’t pay as much for a $1 of earnings given all the added uncertainties with equities. These days with low yields, equity PE ratios tend to be higher. However, the biggest driver of the market multiple is the outlook. If the economy is doing well, with few clouds on the horizon, the PE ratio tends to be higher. When uncertainty about the future path of the economy rises, investors won’t pay as much for earnings as the future path becomes less certain.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: