CAD – Powerful concurrence of factors

The Echelon Insights Team • Jun 02, 2021

In efforts to avoid a term woefully overused in financial commentaries (the term is also the title of a George Clooney fishing movie), we have opted for the literal definition instead. Over the past few months there have been several combining factors that have helped propel the Canadian dollar (CAD) higher and/or the U.S. dollar (USD) lower, lifting the CAD to 83 cents. This run has made the CAD the top performing currency among the big 11 currencies so far in 2021, up 5.3% (chart 1). A move like that over five months has turned some heads, notably when investors see their U.S. denominated assets fighting this strong headwind. 

Versus the USD it is clear 2021 has seen risk-on currencies such as the CAD, Norwegian kroner and Australian dollar performing much better. Meanwhile safe haven currencies including the yen and Swiss Franc have been laggards. The USD is also considered a safe haven currency. With global growth accelerating out of the pandemic, this has been a risk-on currency friendly market. 


CAD Tailwinds 

There are many contributing factors that have helped the CAD rise to 83 cents. Everyone would agree the Bank of Canada and the U.S. Federal Reserve remain dovish by any historical metric, including the overnight lending rates and active bond buying activities (quantitative easing). However, it is the relative moves or the degree of dovishness that has favoured the CAD. The Bank of Canada has started to reduce its quantitative easing while the Fed continues. One would be hard pressed to call the Bank of Canada hawkish, but in this crazy money printing world, less dovish is the new hawkish. 

Perhaps the biggest tailwind of late for the CAD has been the rise in commodity prices. Like it or not, our currency is viewed in the global currency markets as a commodity currency. And the rise in commodity prices has many posturing or wondering if we are in the early innings of a new commodity super cycle. (chart 2).

If you believe we are in a commodity super cycle, the CAD has further upside potential. This is not our investment committee’s view. While many commodity prices have appreciated to levels not seen since the last commodity super cycle, we believe this is a temporary phenomenon for a few reasons. The most obvious is changed consumer behaviour during the social distancing of the pandemic has resulted in increased spending on durable goods. Durable goods require more commodities than non-durables and services. This behaviour change has caused a demand spike for commodities while logistics and capacity remain constrained due to the pandemic. We believe this demand spike will fade with re-opening and supply chain bottlenecks ease. 



To have a new commodity super cycle, the world requires consistently high aggregate demand growth over many years. Similar to the ones experienced during the rapid industrialization of Japan or urbanization of China (chart 3). We do not see one of these secular demand shifts developing and believe this commodity price spike will fade. Along with it, so will the strength in the Canadian dollar. 

Where to from here? 

There are many reasons to be both bullish the CAD and bearish the CAD, in USD terms. In the short-term the CAD bulls can cite global growth recovery, the magnitude of stimulus in the U.S. economy, commodity prices and relative yields being pretty tight. Longer term, well there are often rumblings of the U.S. gradually losing its reserve currency status as global trade becomes more balanced. 


In the short-term CAD bears can cite the CAD is already ‘expensive’ at 83 cents (chart 4). Plus, many of the above-mentioned reasons to be bullish on the CAD are short-term and likely to normalize. Once that border opens, there will be a flood of citizens wanting to spend our CAD outside the country. This flood is likely bigger than the inbound tourists. The US economy is doing much better than Canada, which will translate into yields over time. And longer term, as yields rise given Canada’s relative indebtedness, this tempers our economic outlook even further. 

For Canadian investors the USD/CAD impact is often a zero-sum game. In CAD terms, the USD goes up in risk-off market environments and down in risk-on periods. Clearly that does make USD exposure a good diversification tool for Canadians. Now at 83 cents and enjoying a concurrence of factors, we believe the CAD has priced in a lot (or most) of good news making a move lower for the CAD as the higher probability event (aka USD higher). 


After this run and at 83 cents, this does look like a good time to be adding a bit to U.S. dollar exposure. 

Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P. unless otherwise noted.


The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Richardson Wealth Limited and are used herein under a non-exclusive license by Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) for information purposes only. The statements and statistics contained herein are based on material believed to be reliable but there is no guarantee they are accurate or complete. Particular investments or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual's objectives in consultation with their Echelon representative. 


Forward Looking Statements


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”), its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered.


The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of its author, Richardson Wealth Limited (“Richardson”), used under a non-exclusive license and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Echelon Wealth Partners Inc. (“Echelon”) or its affiliates.


This is not an official publication or research report of Echelon, the author is not an Echelon research analyst and this is not to be used as a solicitation in a jurisdiction where this Echelon representative is not registered. The information contained has not been approved by and are not those of Echelon, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or divisions including but not limited to Chevron Wealth Preservation Inc. The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, but are not guaranteed by us and may be incomplete.


Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Echelon and Richardson do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. These estimates and expectations involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements.


Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections based on beliefs and assumptions made by author. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance or results and no assurance can be given that these estimates and expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or projected in such forward-looking statements. 

Echelon’s Insight Team


Echelon’s Insight Team includes members in various departments such as Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Marketing, Talent, and Compliance who have subject matter expertise and collaborate together to build quality content to help our clients. This team approach helps us ensure content is produced that is meaningful, accurate and timely.

By The Echelon Insights Team 18 Oct, 2021
Inflation sucks. It is essentially a tax on those consuming goods or services, as things simply cost more. Even worse, it is a regressive tax given lower income/wealth consumers tend to spend a higher portion of their income. Now, if you are sitting comfortably on your nest egg and not spending too much, should inflation worry you? That depends on this raging debate as to whether the current spike in inflation is a blip caused by temporary demand and supply imbalances…or the start of something longer term. If inflation runs hotter for longer, the value of that nest egg erodes in real terms—clearly a risk to any long-term financial plan. Currently the good news is higher prices have been predominantly found in what the Atlanta Fed calls ‘flexible priced categories.’ Breaking down the categories in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) into those that are flexible and those that are sticky clearly demonstrates that the headline number is being almost completely pushed higher by the flexible categories. The good news is the prices in these categories can come back down just as fast, supporting the “inflation is transitory” argument. In fact, many have started this descent.  A confluence of factors caused the CPI spike. The pandemic disrupted logistic supply chains that have been increasingly run tighter over the years to reduce costs. Demand came back faster than expected and focused more on durable goods. Global spending behaviours changed quickly. Meanwhile supply adjustments are not as quick. Based on manufacturing survey data, it appears that the worse may be behind us. Readings are still high in many PMI survey questions, including slower delivery times, customer inventories too low, and backlogs rising, but they appear to have peaked a few months ago and are moving in the right direction.
By The Echelon Insights Team 12 Oct, 2021
The market advance over the past year has truly turned a lot of heads, in a good way. After the initial bear and bounce triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic, markets went on a phenomenal run. The rollout of vaccines driving the re-opening trend in the economy helped, as did the continued emergency monetary and fiscal support policies. And what a run. During this advance, consumer spending pivoted much more to durables such as vehicles, homes, and technology. While nominal GDP doesn’t care as much where an individual decides to spend their money, the equity markets much prefer you buy some durables instead of services (like a dinner). 
By The Echelon Insights Team 04 Oct, 2021
Challenges ahead — Greg Taylor September has once again lived up to its reputation for volatility. In many ways this had to be expected as equity markets have experienced one of the longest runs of stable returns and minimal drawdowns in history. However, the timing of this recent volatility should not surprise many, as most of the positive tailwinds that have carried the market to these levels are starting to fade away, setting up what could be a difficult period for capital markets. Global central banks are the biggest and most important factor that have helped elevate recent returns. To their credit, they learned from the mistakes of the global financial crisis where indecision and delay exacerbated things—this time, right from the beginning, the banks did everything they could to help the markets and the economy. But all good things must come to an end, and 18 months after the start of the pandemic, it is time for central banks to begin to remove some emergency measures. This isn’t a bad thing at all. Central banks need to begin to normalize policy to prepare for the next crisis. But it is a change from the recent normal and means that central banks may be less accommodating for the next while. This action resulted in bond yields moving higher across the curve and has led to a change in sector leadership. The growth/value trade has been a subject of much debate over the last few years. As growth has dominated in a period of ever lower bond yields, with the threat of inflation, has this turned? Will the rally in energy be the trigger to get this going once again? The energy sector was a victim of the climate movement, but the resulting cuts to production may be setting us up for a bull market in the commodities as we are already seeing shortages in both natural gas and heating oil. The resulting price increases is also adding further ammunition to the inflation argument as higher costs will undoubtably flow through to the price of goods. What no one really expected in the month was the China risk. Consistently over the last year, China has been working to extend their influence over the capital markets, which has caused many to question if China is at all investible? Their constant clamp down on social media and other growth sectors became a secondary concern as their largest construction company ran into liquidity issues. Evergrande was never going to be a Lehman moment, but it had the potential to leave some scars. For the moment, this risk has faded to the background, but it can’t be ignored and has the potential to flare up once again. What could prove to be the biggest risk to the markets in the near term is earnings season. With the advent of quant funds gaining a greater market share, we have seen companies that beat earning expectations gain versus those that don’t. But as easy comparable estimates fade, huge beats will be harder to achieve. We have already seen some notable companies miss these expectations and the risk is that the next month will be filled with negative earnings revisions. One of the biggest reasons for earning misses has been from broken supply chains. Covid lockdowns and pulled-forward demand for goods did immeasurable damage to the concept of ‘just-in-time’ inventory models. Companies continue to scramble for components, such as semiconductors, in order to product goods. As indicated by the surge in used car prices, the automotive sector has been one of the hardest hit. Until this is fixed, we must expect inflated prices of goods and services and squeezing margins. Whether this is temporary or permanent is still up for debate, but its another headwind to markets.
MORE POSTS →
Share by: